Continuing Improvements. Tell Us How We’re Driving! Send us Feedback

Here's the story about Palin's book-banning try as mayor »

Posted By Wil 2 months, 2 weeks ago in News
9.4

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 9,129

Propped: 103

Comments: 132

Click Prop It to Raise Score
Prop it

Back in 1996, when she first became mayor, Sarah Palin asked the city librarian if she would be all right with censoring library books should she be asked to do so.

According to news coverage at the time, the librarian said she would definitely not be all right with it. A few months later, the librarian, Mary Ellen Emmons, got a letter from Palin telling her she was going to be fired. The censorship issue was not mentioned as a reason for the firing. The letter just said the new mayor felt Emmons didn't fully support her and had to go.

Emmons had been city librarian for seven years and was well liked. After a wave of public support for her, Palin relented and let Emmons keep her job.

Read Full Story at mcclatchydc.com »

132 Comments Report

Submitted By:
Wil

I'm a Propeller Scout, and I run the Geek group. I'm a writer and actor who loves technology and science fiction. But I ...

Also submitted:

Related Articles:

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 132
  • 83%
    Trey2 months, 2 weeks ago

    I can't for the life of me figure out why McCain chose Palin as a running mate.

    Well... I can think of a few but none of them are related to administering the country.

    Reply

    36 Replies

    • 90%
      UnusualSuspect2 months, 2 weeks ago

      Ok...she's conservative. But ban books, books that are OK'd by the Alaskan Library Association? Why do that? What was she afraid of? Her children reading these books? If so, all Palin had to do was restrict what her children read, if that was her concern.

      And then to send out resignation letters as a test of loyalty? This Palin is shaping up to be quite a piece of work.

      Hopefully more people will read about this experience, and learn a lot about this governor from Alaska. The more they learn, the less likely she'll end up being a VP...

      Reply

      22 Replies

    • 10%
      inverse2 months, 2 weeks ago

      I think she ban books to protect her child from pornography or having sex prior to marriage. She will also have no problem to protect our country by burning books which would not put our country first.

      Reply

      1 Reply

    • 100%
      miklkit2 months, 2 weeks ago

      That would be a mighty big bonfire. No thinking human being blindly puts country first. Moral fortitude comes first. You know, the golden rule. No no no, not the republicon version either! :0)

      Reply

      6 Replies

    • 0%
      jerry992 months, 2 weeks ago

      This article is just more of the same by lovers of the know-nothing, no experience sould brother. Just nonsense.

      Reply
      • 94%
        StevieGee2 months, 2 weeks ago

        Anne Kilkenny pretty much sums up and verifies everything that I've heard about Sarah. Heil!

        Reply

        2 Replies

      • 93%
        AnteUp2 months, 2 weeks ago

        Hey mntnman444 ~
        Many thanks for the link. I read the whole thing and - well, isn't it great
        that a self-described homemaker tried so hard to add a degree of specificity
        and source explanation? We rarely - to never - get that from the big cheeses.
        Good for her!

        Reply
        • 100%
          epiphannyy2 months, 2 weeks ago

          mntnman444.....thank you for that link. Everyone should read this, if they haven't already. I will be forwarding it on to those I know.

          Reply
          • 0%
            Klarissa2 months, 2 weeks ago

            Contribution To: Alaska State Democratic Party
            Anne Kilkenny Wasilla, AK $220 5/14/2004 state

            Contribution To: KING-TAYLOR, VIRGINIA (Candidate for Senate 2004 - D)
            06/14/2004 Monetary 7680 $50.00 $50.00 ANNE KILKENNY Wasilla AK

            "Informed voter" or antagonistic party activist? At least as far back as 2004, she donated money to Democrats. No doubt that email is starting to spread and will be considered the Rosetta Stone of Palin as trumpeted from the Democrats. Buyer beware.

            http://www.city-data.com/elec2/08/elec-COLUMBUS-OH...
            COLUMBUS, OH Political Contributions by Individuals

            Anne Kilkenny (Not employed/Homemaker), (Zip code: 43220) $250 to OBAMA FOR AMERICA on 03/19/08

            http://www.topix.com/forum/who/barack-obama/T3BS93...
            Anne Kilkenny, an Obama supporter, currently running for office.......and it appears Mrs Kilkenny has a personal issue with Governor Palin of course the likes of Daily KOS & Huff are still digging as I guess they do not feel Governor Palin has been properly veted yet but think it just fine their candidate of choice has gotten a free pass on everything but his standard fare " he is not the __________ I used to know"

            Reply
          • 93%
            Fedquip2 months, 2 weeks ago

            fta: Four days before the exchange at the City Council, Emmons got a letter from Palin asking for her resignation. Similar letters went to police chief Irl Stambaugh, public works director Jack Felton and finance director Duane Dvorak. John Cooper, a fifth director, resigned after Palin eliminated his job overseeing the city museum.

            Reply

            7 Replies

            • 94%
              Candida2 months, 2 weeks ago

              This is funny. I've copied the same section from the article,but now I don't have to post it. I just want to add one more line:

              "Palin told the Anchorage Daily News then that the letters were just a test of loyalty"

              Asking for someone's resignation as a test of loyalty???? Loyal librarians and public works directors? Politicized public servants in a town of 5,000? That town must be on the other side of the looking glass.

              Reply

              6 Replies

          • 86%
            AbuAmirah2 months, 2 weeks ago

            Hmmm, what to make of this? Well, while working in corporate America, I have seen new bosses come in and within a matter of time, they bring in their own people. Bare in mind that this had nothing to do with censorship. See, this is the slippery slope of electing religious freaks to political office. They eventually try to force upon the rest of us their ideas, ala the Taliban. I mean who is this broad to say what if fit or unfit for me and my family to read or be exposed to? Take a long look America, this chick is going to be the Vice President. If I worked in the White House, I'd install AED's asap, just to keep the Zombie alive for four years

            Reply
            • 96%
              TimALoftis2 months, 2 weeks ago

              This is the kind of thing that the McCain supporters should be very worried about. I still contend that Gov.Palin did not get the kind of vetting from the McCain camp as she should have. Once they saw a possible opportunity to go after the Clinton voters they fell in love with Palin and perhaps a little to quick

              Censoring Books? That is something I have strong views on.

              Reply

              9 Replies

              • 87%
                chuck-the-canuck2 months, 2 weeks ago

                “This is the kind of thing that the McCain supporters should be very worried about.”

                Isn’t it completely obvious to everyone by now, that the republicans are completely delusional? McCain could have selected a blow up sheep to be his running mate and the party faithful would be crowing its praises.

                Do you want to know what worries me?

                The idea that very large numbers of people are completely delusional.

                The idea that a significant number of these delusional people hold the reigns of power.

                The idea that a significant number of these delusional people believe that their particular delusion is the correct delusion and they are willing to kill you to make their point.

                Reply
                • 89%
                  wtagg2 months, 2 weeks ago

                  As I said above, choice is conservative, government deciding for the citizenry is not.

                  Reply

                  4 Replies

                • 100%
                  ProudBlueTexan2 months, 2 weeks ago

                  Forget mccain supporters, they're hopeless! Direct your attention to the undecided. The stakes are too high; there's no time to waste.

                  Reply

                  2 Replies

              • 90%
                PainGoddess2 months, 2 weeks ago

                Nobody has the right to ban books. The citizen has the right to pick or not pick what they read. Freedom of speech covers all forms of print even if it is distasteful or considered "sinful." It is all about the abuse of position and power.

                Reply

                10 Replies

                • 0%
                  DaneL2 months, 2 weeks ago

                  So you would have no problem with kids reading "The Anarchist cookbook" or books detailing how to make bombs or converting semi-automatic weapons to fully automatic?

                  Reply

                  8 Replies